undefined

In a seemingly endless string of bad actors, another so-called California judge, Victor Manuel Torres, should be immediately removed from the bench—and possibly even imprisoned for obstructing justice.  On May 15, 2026, I had a “hearing” with the local crime syndicate—the San Diego Superior Court.  The issue regarded petitions I had filed under section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 10962 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code.  After a one-year wait for two of the matters and a nearly two-year wait for the other two, the syndicate finally decided it was time to face the music.

Knowing full well what Torres’s decision was going to be beforehand, I led off with this question: “I’ve never gone to law school, so I have an honest question that I’d like answered.  Is there a class where they teach the students how to lie with a straight face or falsify records and then how to later try to hide their crimes, or how to cover for each other when one judge commits a crime and then others do things like fraudulently and openly deny it in the records, or even seal entire cases because they are so rife with crime and corruption that you criminals in black gowns want to hide it from public view; is there a class like that?”  I asked this question because I have seen this disgusting criminal behavior well in excess of 100 times over the years in connected cases.

After a significant pause, he simply said, “No.”  He then asked why I hadn’t paid the fee for the four petitions or had them served.  Right on the bottom of each notice I got from the syndicate, it says: “re: Plaintiff’s failure to pay filing fee.”  Nothing whatsoever is mentioned about “service.”

After being interrupted more than once, I replied with: “As usual, the syndicate is trying to flush a case when it knows damn well that the rules and law forbid it.  Apparently, this joke of a hearing is being held because of ‘Plaintiff’s failure to pay filing fee.’  First of all, I’m not a plaintiff; I’m a petitioner.  Second of all, CA code, welfare and institutions code section 10962, which I’m sure you’re thoroughly familiar with, clearly states two things, one of which you didn’t do, and one of which you’re trying not to do.  The first thing, ‘Any such petition to the superior court [the superior syndicate, really]* shall be entitled to a preference in setting a date for hearing on the petition.’  I’d venture to say that any sane person over the age of ten would agree that waiting over a year for the first ‘hearing’—and in at least one instance, about two years—is not ‘a preference.’  The second thing is that this section of code also clearly states, and listen closely, ‘No filing fee shall be required for the filing of a petition pursuant to this section.’  And what you criminals are trying to do is flush my petition.....in spite of this law.  That’s why I haven’t paid the fee.”  *The wording in brackets denotes my personal commentary.

As can be seen directly from the written law in California, a filing fee is not required.  He undoubtedly knew this before I quoted the above law to him.  He does not like being called out for improper behavior, which I have no qualms doing with these glorified, oftentimes unelected, lawyer-criminals in black gowns.  No sooner had I finished speaking, this is when he instantly became a criminal—in my case anyway—by obstructing justice.  In clear violation of civil law, he said, “All four petitions are dismissed,” and immediately terminated the phone call.  He didn’t even try the typical BS that they often attempt to spew, such as saying something like, “You’re not reading that law correctly,” or “There’s an exception that you’re missing,” hoping that such falsities will fool the average pro se litigant.

I knew beforehand exactly what was going to transpire and did not want to waste my gas and time driving to Satan’s house—what I appropriately call courthouses here in Amerika—only to spend over an hour waiting in order to have no more than two minutes in front of such a criminal.  I don’t levy lightly or without basis these accusations of him—or other judges—being a criminal.  18 U.S. Code § 1503(a) unequivocally defines obstruction as anyone who “.....influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be” guilty of a felony.  Similarly, 18 U.S. Code § 1512(c)(2) says “whoever corruptly—otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so” shall be guilty of a felony.

Nobody can reasonably argue that dismissing four cases in direct contradiction of statutory law is anything less than obstruction of justice.  Absurdly assuming for the moment that this criminal had no idea about the particular law, I had just read the relevant parts of it to him verbatim.....and he still dismissed all four matters because he doesn’t like the fact that I called him a criminal and all his friends criminals.  I call things exactly what they are.  If I call someone a criminal, then that person has earned the title.

I filed a complaint with the judicial oversight board, the Commission on Judicial Performance in Big Blue, like I do with all the other judge-criminals, but I guarantee it will be filed under “G” like the 100+ other complaints I’ve filed against lawyers and black-gown-clad lawyers nationwide.  Until people in this once great nation wake up to the biggest problem ever to plague us, this kind of outrageous criminal misconduct by members of the world’s largest crime syndicate will continue to worsen.  The full audio of the dialog with Judge Torres along with a voicemail I left afterward can be heard at this link.

If you need to contact Judge Victor M. Torres about corrupt and/or criminal rulings in your own case, I'm sure he'd love to hear from you.  He can be reached at:
victor.torres@sdcourt.ca.gov
619-865-3486 (m)
13465 Thunderhead Street, San Diego, CA 92129

Incidentally, Sara and I would like to let readers know that our blog has been rated the best anti-corruption blog out of well over one thousand in the nation. We are honored to have been bestowed this distinction and will continually try to meet the requisite standards by doing our best to fight crime and corruption in the American "justice" system every day.